.

MCA has deteriorate so much after its party’s public infighting between Chua Soi Lek and Ong Tee Keat in 2010. One is a provincial leader and the other with questionable leadership skill.

In fact, all MCA leaders have poor records – all failed to upgrade their members and the Chinese community’s mindset from village mentality – they rather take service shortcuts rather than way of policy in addressing issues so that the problem will not be repeated again.

Thus Michael Chong becomes brandname for those unthinking lazy shortcuts to ‘help’ service personal problems. MCA’s Members of Parliament and ADUNs love their service role, which is similar to a Ketua Kampung.

Can you can see the job position titles do not match? MPs and ADUNs’ jobs are to legislate laws. Ketua Kampung are to take care of all issues from family fights to Ah Longs, basically SERVICE. MCA refuses to upgrade themselves from Ketua Kampung mindsets, it is always service.

Service does not equal lawmaking.

Therefore, it is no wonder to us that MCA failed to influence national politics, as they abdicated lawmaking for service. Thus the failure to drive MCA members to reach for higher political aspirations.

So, every year, MCA plays the service role rather than policymaking to resolve issues of education (JPA) and especially businesses, etc for the Chinese community.

Does MCA stand a chance in GE13 as part of the Barisan Nasional team?

We think there is.